What does a meaningful human release check include?
A human release check only works when the reviewer knows exactly what they're responsible for deciding. Name the release owner and the scope of the check, and decide in advance what stops a release.
In the Power Shift discussion, a speaker described retaining human review before a product goes live. For a website update, I'd have the scope cover the intended audience, accurate claims, working links, permissions and the page as visitors will see it. Other kinds of work need different checks.
Give the reviewer evidence and the current version, and skip the message that just says the AI has finished. Make the changes and unresolved questions easy to find.
A missing approval, an unsupported claim or an untested critical path shouldn't slip through because the deadline is close. Settle who can address the problem and how the revised result comes back for review.
Cover what happens after release too. Who watches for a problem, and who can correct or withdraw the change through an approved process?
A human check takes time and judgment, so plan for both. A reviewer who can't inspect the evidence or understand the result isn't adding much by sitting at the final step.