Skip to content
FQ AI Summit 2026

Map the Business Incentive Behind an AI Proposal

My notes from attending the FQ AI Summit in New York, November 10, 2026.

Creative Review and AI Predictions

What should I ask when the business case for AI sounds inevitable?

Ice-T's conversation raised a tension between economic incentives and moral concerns, and his prediction about which will win is his own view. For a team, the practical move is to make the incentives visible before anyone approves a change.

Two people seated in conversation on stage under the session screen.
The Ice-T conversation. The Female Quotient AI Summit, Webster Hall, New York, November 10, 2026.

Take one proposed use of AI. Work out who pays for it, who gets the financial benefit and who does the extra work when it fails. Those can be different people. A department can report faster output while sending more corrections to another team.

Ask how the proposal earns its return. It might reduce a necessary expense or improve a service, or it might move work outside the measurement. Bring review, support and recovery into the discussion.

Some decisions stay open even when the numbers look good. Permission to use someone's likeness, an employee's new responsibilities and a customer's access to help each need an answer of their own.

Put the tradeoff in the approval note. If leaders choose a lower cost with a slower human response, say so plainly. People should be able to see whose experience a business case improves and whose burden it changes.

What to try this week

Ask whoever brings the next AI proposal to name who absorbs the cleanup when it fails. Write the answer into the approval note, even when it's awkward.